Has it been that long
already? In 1974, a strange man entered
America’s consciousness via television.
Acting out what seemed to be primitive rites, he would brandish
cattails, goldenrod, hickory nuts, and pine branches, instructing the viewers
that “many parts are edible, you know.”
Euell Gibbons rapidly
became fodder for comedians who turned his “Stalking the Wild ...” book titles
into the comedy cliché of the year.
But, in the summer of 1975, the Federal Trade Commission ordered
Gibbons’ commercials for Post Grape-Nuts cereal off the air, and, by the time
he died on December 29 of 1975, Gibbons’ celebrity had diminished considerably.
That was a shame, for
Gibbons did have a valuable message for America: There are tons of wild, nutritious food growing everywhere in
this country that we could -- but don’t -- eat. Gibbons believed that the main reason that Americans shun wild
food is fear of ridicule if they stoop to gather weeds, which are generally
regarded as suitable only for the trash can, not the dinner table.
The FTC ruling appeared
to speak to a deeper fear: fear of the
unknown. In the cereal commercials,
Gibbons spoke of his years of foraging for wild food. “Ever eat a pine tree?” he asked in one spot. “Many parts are edible. Natural ingredients are important to
me. That’s why Post Grape-Nuts is part
of my breakfast.”
The FTC objected to the
apparent connection, especially as it might be interpreted by children. The ruling said that the commercials
“undercut a commonly recognized safety principle -- namely, that children
should not eat any plants found growing in natural surroundings, except under
adult supervision.”
Despite its good
intentions, the FTC succeeded in generating a great wave of mistrust and fear
of all wild food, despite the fact that Gibbons stressed in his books and
countless public appearances that you much never eat any plant or part of a
plant until you recognize it as edible.
Shortly after the FTC ruling, the media latched onto two incidents in
which teen-agers who had been captivated by Gibbons’ living-off-the-land philosophy
became ill when they mistakenly ate toxic plants while foraging near the
Angeles National Forest.
Gibbons’ death of
unspecified “natural causes” at the age of 64 seemed to seal his reputation as
a “kook.” At worst, people suspected
that he had accidentally poisoned himself (he hadn’t); at best, it appeared
that eating “natural” foods did not contribute to longevity. But those of us who saw the real value of
Gibbons’ teachings still feel that he left us with a precious legacy.
I first encountered Gibbons
in 1972, through his writings. Excited
and fascinated by “Stalking the Wild Asparagus” and his other books, I explored
fields and woods across the country in search of wild edibles. In 1974, I began to share what I had learned
by conducting Wild Food Outings in the Los Angeles area.
I finally met Gibbons
after he gave a lecture at Pasadena City College. We chatted for the better part of an hour, our conversation
ranging from carob pods to American Indians to compost. He told me of his plans for television
documentaries about primitive societies that still live totally ecological
lives. Gibbons said he hoped to show
the modern world some of the follies of civilization.
One of these follies is
the persistence -- the expenditure of so much time and money -- in attempting
to eradicate from our yards and parks plants that have thrived for
centuries. Some of the most common
edible “intruders” are dandelion, lamb’s quarter, pigweed, mallow, mustard, and
sow thistle. Among the most enduring of
wild plants that were brought to California in the westward migrations is
chickweed. To even the most pampered
palate, it is an incredibly good salad green, yet it often leads the list of
“garden pests” in advertisements for herbicides. Other “enemies” highly valued by herbalists and naturalists are
wild garlic, plantain, purslane, French sorrel, sour grass, and ground ivy.
Many of the common wild
plants have been used for centuries as herbal medicine, and still have value
for simple ailments. But, like any
medicinal ingredient, they can be harmful when abused. In 1976, jimsonweed, which has been in
California for probably thousands of years, became the target of an eradication
program when some people erroneously popularized it as a cheap “high.” This was a typical case of ignorance about
wild food that could be countered by some basic education rather than by the
wholesale application of herbicides across our countryside.
So, while many people
regarded the natural foods “craze” as a passing fad, others found much that is
worthwhile in what Gibbons brought to the national attention. I know I do. Gibbons was just passing along something that our ancestors knew,
something that is still a deeply respected tradition in many parts of even the
“civilized” world where scarce food is more prized than ornamental
gardens. Despite the ridicule of
passersby, on almost any day in almost any park right here in the city, people
still gather berries, cactus, mustard greens, chickweed, and wild
mushrooms. These wild foods are there
for the taking -- foods that grow in relative abundance and that are much
better for you than a lot of the processed junk sold in supermarkets.
Euell Gibbons and his
many adherents warrant our admiration, not our mockery.
[Since 1974, Nyerges has led outings and classes to identify and use wild edibles. To learn about these classes, contact the School of Self-reliance, Box 41834, Eagle Rock, CA 90041, or www.ChristopherNyerges.com]
9 comments:
Do you know how tall Euell Gibbons was? I know he died from complications of Marfan Syndrome, and that people with Marfan are particularly tall. I have searched, but can only find "well over six feet tall."
Since you knew him, perhaps you can narrow down that range? Was he taller than 6'4"? 6'6"? I would understand you might not know exactly, but I sure would like to know more specifically.
His books were great. It really is too bad he is most known for his Grape Nuts commercial.
I have read that Euell Gibbons was 6' 2" tall. I was present at a talk he gave at the College of Environmental Science and Forestry, on the campus of Syracuse University in Syracuse, New York. He stood on a stage above us when he spoke, and it made him seem even taller than that. If someone had told me that he was 6' 4" tall, I would have believed it.
I'm 5'11" and though Gibbons was taller than me, he wasn't significantly taller. My guess, from the one time I was with him, is that he was about 6'2"
Was he thin?
Im 6' 5.5" My dad (Ronald Euell Gibbons) was 6' 2" Grandfather was Barrel Chested. A burly guy. I was 13 when he passed away. Ill see if I can get a reference in my papers but I recall him being 6'2' The same as my dad. I am at a loss to understand this Marfan Syndrome. I have seen this on line. No idea why. i have a good idea why he had a hart rupture in the end. But not Marfan Syndrome.
John Elden Gibbons
Hi John, Thank you for posting an answer to my comment.
Marfan Syndrome is a genetic syndrome that creates a degenerative connective tissue problem in people who have it, and for some reason it tends to make people especially tall, and often (but not always) thin. One of the worst effects from it, is a ruptured aorta (part of the heart).
Online there are Marfan sites and also on Euell Gibbons' Wikipedia article, they say they think he had Marfan syndrome. And having died from the aortic rupture doesn't argue against that idea. Of course, it surely doesn't prove it!
As you are very tall, however, that also puts you in the question. A very simple "screening" test for Marfan syndrome is to put your pinky and thumb around the narrowest part of your wrist, and see if the pinky and thumb overlap. In normal humans they won't even touch because the fingers aren't long enough to go all the way around the wrist. In people with Marfan Syndrome (or a similar syndrome) their fingers are extra long, so they go all the way around, and even overlap some.
Another "screening" test is to lay on the floor with your arms out, and have someone measure you from fingertip to fingertip. Normal is about the same distance fingertip to fingertip, or "wingspan" as height. With Marfan Syndrome, the wingspan is about 2 inches longer than the person's height.
The reason I say "screening" is because these are not actually diagnostic, but if you do have these signs, you should definitely see a cardiologist to get an actual medical evaluation for Marfan Syndrome.
Your tests as stated are negative across the board. I believe it would have been for my father and Euell. As a kid you compare hand to your child. Freda always commented on the three of use having the same walk. I can look at old photos and tell that no way any of those tests would be found positive. One photo is from a well published photo with Euell's hands on his knees. That photo was shot in my parents living room. yes 3d would need to be matched. Just do the measurements. Much like aerial recon and map making. A skill too few Bushcrafters use. I have spent a lot of time doing CAD work, drawing maps and hydrographic charts. If someone in my family has been diagnosed with this I am unaware. Remember it takes 2 parents. Genetics, ok could be possible Diabetes (See Euells book with Joe) High BP and other environmental and life style factors, all possible. My father ultimately died of agent Orange exposure.
Interesting thread. John Elden Gibbons
PS big fan of wilderness way. Im sad its not published anymore. Had emails with Tom Epell. I need to call him about a Russian Chimney we are building. Im also sad at the loss of Ron Hood many years ago, and now my old Mentor Marty Simon. I had spoken to Ron before his passing. Vietnam took its toll on both of them as well.
I am glad they are negative, John. I don't know how your grandfather died, and it is nobody's business outside your family. Folks with this or that challenge, tend to look for others with the same challenge who "made good" in one way or another. Combined with the height and death of Euell Gibbons, I suspect the connection being made was one of respect and recognition more than anything.
Be well.
John, thank you for sharing. I just today saw these comments... apparently old!
Post a Comment