Why give gifts we can't afford to people we don't like?
Another view of Holiday Gifting
“Have you done your shopping yet?,” an acquaintance asked. I gasped, feeling the despair that descends upon me when I witness the scurry run-around that so many folks engage in during the Christmas season. Giving is good, yes. Receiving is good too.
Like the ancient native potlatch
where tribal members tried to outdo each other in their givingness. But have we moved too far from meaningful giving? Have we accepted
the propaganda that the “Christmas shopping splurge” should somehow “save” the
retail industry? Have we lost our
resistance? Have we given in the
fiction that it is socially necessary to buy lots of stuff (that we’d not buy otherwise)
for people who we don’t particularly like, when we really can’t afford to do
so?
The way to end the insanity is
simply to end it. End the pointless
buying.
What are we celebrating, after
all? Santa Claus-who-brings-us-toys
day? The Winter Solstice? The birth of the Sun? The birth of the Son, Jesus?
Most American Christians say it is
the latter. So then why the gift
splurge? Some say this is because the
three Magi brought gifts to the promised One.
The Magi gave symbolic gifts, nothing that was in any way useful to an
infant. They did not exchange gifts
among themselves.
Nor was this Jesus born on December
25. Recall, if you will, that animals
and shepherds were in the fields, and it was the time of a census that required
much travelling. It was definitely not
in the dead of winter, as all historians agree.
Let’s get out our encyclopedias and
learn that the “birth of the Sun”
celebrations were pre-Christian. These
so-called “pagan” traditions were part of the holy days of Mithraism and other
pre-Christian religions. Exchanging
gifts was part of that tradition.
In the early days of the new cult of
Christianity that arose from Judaism, there was the desire to “hide” the new
Christian commemoration of the birth of Jesus when others were also celebrating
the birth of the Sun. Some credit the
Roman Emperor Aurelian with this clever idea.
Eventually, when Christianity was the official religion of the empire in
the 4th century, no such hiding was necessary as nearly all the
pagan holidays became Christianized.
Still, our pointless profligate
buying and giving is a relatively modern invention of the advertising
industry. Gone are the days of making
something to give to another – a cake, cookies, a wooden bowl, a pipe, a toy, a
hand-written card. Gone are the days of
personally handing a thoughtfully-made or acquired object to a person, as both
parties exchange the gift of their time, and Selves, to one another, as they
examine the physical object. Or is such
a day gone?
It is only by our choice to be a
lemming that we continue the mindless buy and gift command from our marketing
masters.
I’m not particularly concerned that
most of the modern Christmas symbols can be traced back to the pre-Christian
days – the wreath, the tree, the yule log, December 25, the birth of a saviour
at the time of least light, the cards, and yes, gifting. What matters most is the level of thinking
and thoughtfulness that we inject into our observation of what should be a High
Holy Day. “Buying stuff” is anathema to
this day. We don’t have to choose to be
a part of the cattle drive at the local mall.
Rather, choose something else.
Plan to be with close friends. Plan thoughtful songs to sing. Plan special movies to watch – I never get
tired of “It’s a Wonderful Life.” Plan
thoughtful readings about the meaning of the day. And if you choose to give gifts, avoid the animalistic urge to
wildly rip through the packagings of gift after gift. Make each one special.
Tell the person why they were given the gift. Let them open it and
examine it. Discuss how the gift will enhance their life.
I remember a scene in the book “Less
Than Zero.” It’s Christmas time and the
author is at home when his father visits. The father is divorced from his
mother, so he visits on holidays. As he
sits there on Christmas, he pulls out his checkbook and writes a check to his
son. The author – the son – lamented
that his father didn’t take the time to at least write the check ahead of time,
put it in an envelope, and include a note.
It was just done rather casual.
It was a classic “less than zero” moment.
In this time of least light, when
the sun is about to start on the path to more light and longer days, when so
many of us are scrambling at the malls for “good buys,” we can choose to eschew
“less than zero,” and choose instead the Light.
No comments:
Post a Comment