"Easter," and the man behind it....
In
Search of the Historical Jesus
[Nyerges
is an educator, and author of such books as “Extreme Simplicity,” “Enter the
Forest,” and “Self-Sufficient Home.” You
can learn more about his classes and activities at www.SchoolofSelf-Reliance.com.]
Jesus! What a
man he was! Perhaps the most amazing
thing about Jesus – a man who is known and worshipped by at least a third of
all humanity, and around whom our system of reckoning time revolves – is that
there is still so much debate about who he was, what he did, how he lived, and what
he believed. Hundreds of differing sects
are stark testament to the fact that though Jesus might have had “one message,”
that message has been widely interpreted over the centuries.
Let’s work through some basics. As an historical
person, he can be placed in a specific time and location. All historians concede that they do not
know the birthday of Jesus, but it’s not Christmas day. Most scholars suggest that Jesus was born in
either April or September, in 4 B.C. or 6 B.C.
“Jesus” was not his name, just the English rendering
of Yeshua. Did he have a full name? Yes, of course, and it was not “Jesus
Christ,” which is a title, meaning Jesus the Christ, or Jesus the
Annointed. Historians say that the
actual name was Yeshua ben Josephus, that is, Jesus son of Joseph. Another version says it is Yeshua ben
Pandirah, Jesus son of the Panther. In
Indian literature, he is referred to as Yuz Asaf, in the Koran he is Isa (or
Issa).
WAS JESUS BLACK?
Ethnically, culturally, and religiously, he was
Jewish. But occasionally, a writer will
suggest that Jesus was actually black, with such evidence as the preponderance
of the “Black Madonnas” found throughout Europe. The only Biblical evidence on this are the
two lineages of Jesus provided, which uncharacteristically include women.
The key genealogies of Jesus listed
in the Bible are Luke 3: 23-31, and Matthew 1:1-17. In these lineages, we are told of at least
four of the women in Jesus’ genealogical line.
These are Rehab, Ruth, Tamar, and Bathsheba. Rehab (also spelled Rahab) was a
Canaanite. Tamar was probably a
Canaanite. Bethsheba, often referred to
as a Hittite, was more likely Japhethic, that is, not a descendant of Ham.
(However, this is not clear). Ruth was
in the line of Ham. Now, who was Ham?
Who were the Canaanites and Hittites?
According to Genesis 9:19, all
mankind descended from Noah’s three
sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Ham’s
descendants became the black people who settled in Africa, and parts of the
Arabian peninsula. His sons were Cush,
whose descendants settled in Ethiopia, Mizraim, whose descendants settled in
Egypt, Put, whose descendants settled in Libya, and Canaan, whose descendants
settled in Palestine. The descendants of Cush were the main populace of the
Cushite Empire, which extended from western Libya to Ethiopia and Nubia, all of
present day Egypt, and the Arabian peninsula into the mountains of Turkey. They spoke several languages and had skin
pigmentation ranging from dark black to medium brown.
It takes a bit of study to ascertain
who these people were – and there were other possible African women in Jesus’
lineage as well – but, in general, when we are speaking of Cushites,
Canaanites, descendants of Ham, etc., we are speaking of Africans. It is entirely possible that this wasn’t a
big deal when the scriptures were written since Jesus’ racial background was
common knowledge.
So, although Jesus had some African
ancestry, his physical appearance was such that he fit right in with the Jews
of that era, based on several passages
that indicate that Jesus not only looked like every one else of the day, but
was also very average and normal looking Middle-Easterner, not sticking out at
all.
THE EARLY YEARS
The Bible speak of the young Jesus talking to the
Rabbis in the Temple, sharing his youthful wisdom with the elders to the
surprise of his parents. Then there is
no Biblical record of what he did as a teenager, and during his 20s. We don’t hear from his again in the Bible until
his appearance on the scene at about age 30, where he turned water into wine at
a wedding feast, and is depicted as a healer, prophet, and fisher of men.
His religious observations would have been the regular
observations for Jews of the day, and quite different from the observations of
most Christian sects today. The reasons
for this are well-known. The early
Christians were known as Judeo-Christians (Jews who followed the Christ), and
as the new religion became more and more encompassing, it eventually became
Christianity by the 4th Century. In order to attract ever-more
followers, Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the Kingdom,
and Christianized all the popular Mythraic (so-called Pagan) observations and turned
them into Christian Holy Days.
Catholocism, after all, means Universalist.
Growing up as a Catholic, I studied
Jesus, and wanted to be holy like him. I wanted to be like Jesus -- but what
did that really mean? There was so much
about this person that was beyond my ability to research. For example, what Holy Days would Jesus have
observed? Was he an Essene? Was he a
Nazarene? What did these groups believe and practice? Did he have any Buddhist
influence? Who were his closest
followers, the apostles? What did he
actually teach his close followers, beyond what is known from his various
public talks? Were his miracles and
public healings actual events, or were they symbolic stories? These and other questions have always swirled
around this man called Jesus.
As a student of the real and historical Jesus, here
are just a few of the many books I have found to be useful.
Garner Ted Armstrong of the
Worldwide Church of God in Pasadena, wrote a book about the “Real Jesus,” and
Jesus was described as a hard-working, athletic, health-food eating powerful
man, a sort of health advocate Gypsy Boots of the past. But certainly Jesus was
much more than that.
Holger Kersten in his “Jesus Lived
in India” book presents a very different Jesus, one who is depicted on the
Shroud of Turin, and one who traveled to India and studied from the Buddhists.
In fact, the way in which the holy men of the Bible sought and found the baby
Jesus is very much of the pattern of the holy men of Tibet seeking and finding
the next Dali Lama, and Kersten puts Jesus in that very same pattern.
Manly Hall, who founded Los Angeles’
Philosophical Research Society, writes that the patterns of all historical
saviors (he cites at least 16) include more or less the same elements. But Hall is less concerned about historical
facts than he is in demonstrating that there is an extant prototype of human
spiritual evolution.
According to Harold Percival in his
“Thinking and Destiny” book, Jesus succeeded in re-uniting his Doer and Thinker
and Knower, his internal trinity, which put him in touch with his divinity,
which made him, effectively, a God.
Though Percival’s terminology is unfamiliar to most Christians, he is
less concerned about the historical details of Jesus and more concerned about
what Jesus did, and became, that made him a focal point of most societies on
earth over the last 2000 years. According to Percival, the virgin birth, the
miracles, and the resurrection should all be studied to find the inner meanings
for our own individual evolution.
There is also a silly but
interesting book that purports to show that Jesus was never a person but
actually a hallucinogenic mushroom. Don’t bother reading it. Another book suggests
that there was no Jesus, that he is just a made-up person as a metaphor of astrological
principles. Really?
I believe it is unwise (and
incorrect) to suggest that a Jesus never existed because of the way his
followers centuries later chose to remember him, and continued to overlay so
many symbols onto the historical person.
Jesus lived, and it is not
reasonable to assume that the stories of such a great one arose from mere myth
or fabrication. Such a person lived, and his influence of what he did and said
affected many people.
Regardless of your religious
background or belief, you are likely to be richly rewarded by delving deeply
into the nuances of who Jesus was. When
everyone’s mind is upon Jesus and the Mysteries during the Easter season, I
have found great value in viewing the “Jesus of Nazareth” series, and I even
find value in such depictions as “Jesus Christ Superstar.” Unlike so many who purport to follow in his
path, I find the real Jesus one who was not dogmatic, but one who knew that
only when we recognize each other’s humanity do we rise up into our own
divinities.
According to Holger Kersten, “Jesus did not
supply theories to be ground in the mills of academia, about his path and message
– he just lived his teachings!
Tolerance, unprejudiced acceptance of others, giving and sharing, the
capacity to take upon oneself the burdens of others, in other words, unlimited
love in action and service for one’s fellow human beings – this is the path
which Jesus showed to salvation.”
30 --
2 comments:
thank you for your comment.
Post a Comment