Dear Mr. Trump:
I have been thinking of writing to you for some time, and
I’ve finally gotten around to it.
I didn’t know much about you in the past, though your name
was occasionally in the news. I watched
and like your Apprentice show, because it forced people to quickly make a plan,
and quickly implement a plan to get some business going. In general, I liked
the show because I saw young entrepreneurs working creatively to make a buck. I kept a lot of my ideas to myself as I
watched the show, such as “it seems that it doesn’t really matter HOW you make
a buck, as long as you make the most.” I mean, sometimes the “winner” wasn’t
really a winner in my eyes, but they always made the most money, which was the
tangible and measurable factor by which you gauged “success.”
Sometimes I agreed with your reasons for “firing” one of the
contestants, especially when you thought they used less than ideal or socially
acceptable means to earn their day’s money.
Overall, the show seemed like an aggressive business boot
camp where you do or die, make money or go home.
It was very entertaining, and it made me realize that
American business and creativity are not dead.
(Though, to be honest, I much prefer the recent “Shark Tank,” where
existing small business people vie for investment money.)
Somewhere in there, I recall seeing on TV how you sold Merv
Griffin an old apartment building. Merv
was happy, and you got the price you wanted, but in talking about it, I was a
bit perplexed that you had to call Merv Griffin names and belittle his
character, because you wanted it known that you won and he lost. I recall wondering, why couldn’t you both
have “won”? You got rid of something
you didn’t want, and Merv got something he wanted. Win-win. But no, you had to demean Merv, for reasons
I never knew. Surely a “big businessman” doesn’t resort to such tactics.
Now we see you more often than during the Apprentice in your
bid for the presidency. Let me explain
why I am ashamed at what I now see you doing.
Yes, you say you want to make America great again. That’s
all fine and dandy.
I was brought up in the world of William Buckley’s Firing
Line on Sunday afternoons, where he would debate complex matters with people he
disagreed with, always with a smile, always sticking to the issues, never ever
stooping to such puerility as calling each other names, as boys do in the
bathroom or out on the school yard.
I do not understand why you stoop to 3rd grade
bully tactics when talking to and with people who should be, at least on a
certain level of abstraction, your colleagues and potential partners. To bring up Carly Fiorone’s face and to
suggest that she is not good looking was a low blow, and unnecessary. Come on,
Donald, have you ever looked in a mirror lately? Everyone ages and beauty is fleeting. The presidency is not a
beauty contest. You have nit-picked
every other running mate, in one way or another, in personal attacks that are
not worthy of a presidential candidate, and definitely unbecoming and
undesirable in an actual president, and nearly always in ways that have nothing
at all to do with their ability to run the country.
I cannot remember
another President in my lifetime who ever publicly stooped to such personal
attacks. Probably the closest thing was Ronald Reagan saying he was going to
whip Jimmy Carter’s ass. But he never
again, to my knowledge, stooped to a gutter level in his interactions with, or
his speaking about, Carter or others.
The fact that you continue to do so means that this is a
very natural state of mind for you. It is also painfully obvious that you have
no one in your inner circle (that you listen to) who tells you the great harm
you are doing by this continued childish name-calling. You hurt yourself, at
least it seems so. You hurt the Republican party, which to date, has been used
to a campaign with at least outward civility. And you hurt the office of the
presidency.
Believe me, I am no fan of Hillary in this extraordinary
campaign year. She has out-Nixoned
Nixon already, and amazingly, her supporters are legion, who seem not to care
about her deep character flaws.
Nevertheless, Mr. Trump, don’t you understand that civility
and yes, even politeness and tactfulness, are the hallmarks of a real
leader? I fear that all your money is
going to your head, and you believe that
you have so much money, that you can say whatever you want. Yes, you can, but you bring down our revered
institutions each time you belittle another candidate in your childish tirades.
Can’t you stick to the real issues upon which a presidency will be
involved?
Your quick and ridiculing and belittling comments are
unworthy of a chief of state who will also need to interact other world
leaders, whose co-operation is better than their anger. You will not be able to “fire” other world
leaders who do not see things your way.
Yes, I know there are the frustrated masses who like you
because you are not politically-correct and because you “speak your mind.” These are good things, to a point. Being candid and honest is generally a good
thing. But your “letting it all hang
out” is not a good thing. It is
the political version of the Oregon Bhagwan’s free-for-all orgies where
anything could and did happen, and eventually the towns organized to eliminate
the Bhagwan guru and his followers.
Some people like your style now, and I tremble to say that they like the
style which has no substance, and they are swayed by the apparent free-style
which has gone out of the bounds of presidential decency.
Perhaps someone will arise who can be a real uniter, someone
who Democrats and Republicans and Independents can unite behind for the good of
the country. Perhaps it is time for the rise of a meaningful third party, since
the available options are looking increasingly bleak.
It would be better for the country, and the presidency, Mr.
Trump, if you dropped out of the race and went back to your very entertaining
Apprentice show, and your many business enterprises which you enjoy so much. You have not demonstrated the ability to
negotiate on a political level, and to bring people together in a common
win-win agreement. At least if you go
back to the Apprentice and to your business enterprises, you will be able to
call those under your control whatever you wish without international
consequences.
1 comment:
Well said Christopher.
Post a Comment